US Weapons for Raw Materials: Will Kyiv Agree?

A win-win situation

Commenting in ukrainian Obozrevatel, political scientist Serhiy Taran sees advantages for both sides:

“The US could reduce its dependence on Chinese imports, ensure the production of defence and high-tech goods, and strengthen the geopolitical position of the US and its allies in the competition with China. Ukraine would get US bases, US investors and budget revenues, jobs for veterans who would happily defend the foreign capital, and of course American troops. These would be real security guarantees. ... The Russians would never dare to attack a territory where US companies are located and protected by the US army.”

Benefiting from naked pragmatism

British The Daily Telegraph speculates:

“Ukraine’s retention of land in Kursk could serve as a vital bargaining chip for the restoration of mineral deposits in areas of southern Ukraine that Russia does not fully control. Once a peace settlement is obtained, Ukraine hopes that these resources will bolster its strategic value to the US and ensure that Washington provides credible guarantees against future Russian aggression. As Russia refuses to seriously entertain peace negotiations, Ukraine could be the unexpected beneficiary of Trump’s naked pragmatism.”

A small victory for Zelensky

Russian Meduza comments:

“The ‘aid in exchange for resources’ construct does indeed look attractive for all sides of the potential deal, notwithstanding all the costs and risks associated with the war. ... And for Zelensky, too, Trump’s proposal is a small victory. Firstly, although the solution has been presented as a ‘deal’, he has received clear approval from the new US president for the continuation of military and financial aid. Secondly, Trump has essentially agreed to one of the points in Zelensky’s ‘victory plan’.”

Other Topics of Interest

25 Million Hits for Musk’s Repost of Fake ‘USAID Paid Hollywood Stars to Visit Ukraine’ Video

The billionaire doubled down on his avowed intention to close down USAID – what he called the “viper’s nest of radical-left Marxists” – by sharing the now-discredited allegations.